There have been many debates about top athletes and what makes some of them better than others. Some people think that taller people are better at running and sports that require speed. Some people think that overweight people are naturally better at sumo wrestling.
There are many arguments about what make some athletes great. We will take a look at the main ones in the sections below.
National wealth
Some people think that rich countries do better than poor countries at sports in general. When a country has money they can help their sports teams more. When they don’t, there are more problems.
There is logic to this argument. The country with the world’s biggest economy also won the most Olympic medals. And it has for several Olympics In row. The same is true for the world’s second richest country, and it won the second biggest number of medals.
But there are also poor countries that do well in sports. Some of the world’s poorest have some of the best cricket teams in the world. In fact this is true of entire regions So national wealth isn’t the whole story when it comes to sports success.
Financing
Having national wealth is one thing. There is also a question of how much governments give to their teams. Some countries value sports highly and their athletes receive a lot of funding. Other countries might be wealthy but they do not value sports.
Some countries are obsessed with their national football teams. And they get a lot of funding for them. But success could be a combination of any factors. It is also helpful when fans are supportive and root for their teams.
So it is difficult to say whether national financing is a big factor in sports success. It definitely doesn’t hurt. But isolating funding can be a mistaken way to gage progress.
Body type
Many people also think that body types can dictate success in sports. There is some truth to this. No question about that. And some people might believe that this automatically makes some countries great.
Migration is a confusing factor
A solid counter-argument to this theory is that migration can produce immigrant athletes in countries that excel in certain sports who are just as strong as their native counterparts. Japanese Brazilians, for example, have proven to be just as proficient at football as ethnic Brazilians are.
Some countries are melting pots ethnically. And their athletes still manage to win. So the genetics theory alone cannot be considered the whole explanation.
Coaches with successful histories sometimes move to new countries. And the teams that they start to work with also start to win. So some athletes might have a better disposition for sports. But there is definitely an advantage to solid training.
Questions still remain
Beyond the question of funding alone, there are further considerations about where the money goes, how good the overall infrastructure is, etc. If a country puts huge amounts of money into a given sport and pays its coaches well but athletes still struggle to get by, this can be problematic.
In the US, this has tended to be a problem for amateur athletes in the past. Many non-professional athletes in Olympic sports have had to work on top of their training just to support themselves. This takes away from training time and makes it more difficult for them to excel.
What is clear is that you can find any number of ways to track your favorite athletes and teams online these days. There are any number of portals that provide information, statistics, forums for discussion, etc. And you can wager on your favorite teams, as well. Download https://india1xbet.in/en/mobile and see if you can win on your team in the next game.
Conclusion
Sports are changing just as life is. And it will continue to change. What is different recently is that we can track changes more easily. We can now analyze sports movements and training closely. There are advanced technological tools that help us do this. It will be exciting to see how things change in the future. Maybe there will be new superstar countries in ten years.
